regex-dna benchmark ≈50MB N=5,000,000

Each chart bar shows how many times slower, one ↓ regex-dna program was, compared to the fastest program.

These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programming languages.

Column × shows how many times more each program used compared to the benchmark program that used least.

    sort sortsort
  ×   Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
1.0C gcc 5.812.44305,4882579  60% 51% 80% 52%
1.5C++ g++ #2 5.273.55198,920695  9% 49% 69% 26%
1.7C++ g++ #4 12.644.2598,1601759  67% 75% 97% 60%
2.1C++ g++ 5.235.23208,580648  2% 100% 1% 1%
2.4Ada 2005 GNAT #5 17.885.80123,8523492  77% 77% 87% 68%
3.2Ada 2005 GNAT #6 23.457.76111,1283740  65% 68% 97% 72%
3.2C gcc #4 23.377.80103,7521525  71% 66% 100% 64%
3.3Scala #5 28.228.16422,9361704  96% 80% 87% 85%
3.5Java  #5 24.528.59707,744929  80% 64% 79% 64%
3.7OCaml #4 1.468.96264,7441050  84% 95% 85% 85%
3.9Haskell GHC #2 35.699.52250,0081518  93% 91% 96% 96%
3.9Hack #4 27.939.53150,480832  99% 66% 67% 62%
3.9PHP #4 26.249.60151,380832  52% 70% 57% 95%
4.3Python 3 22.9810.42269,120478  40% 48% 83% 55%
4.4PHP 12.0610.71210,752788  64% 57% 46% 79%
4.4OCaml 19.2710.78511,7241502  88% 26% 26% 39%
4.4OCaml #3 19.2510.81511,7161014  27% 26% 39% 87%
4.6Hack 13.1711.20267,120787  49% 76% 71% 51%
4.6Perl #2 30.7511.21141,108527  49% 70% 76% 80%
6.1Java  #2 47.7714.93569,9761534  80% 76% 80% 84%
6.1Ruby #3 34.1615.00291,124501  42% 41% 91% 54%
6.2Rust 41.9915.23228,400878  59% 79% 80% 59%
6.4Scala #2 34.3015.58862,756668  53% 59% 70% 39%
6.7Go #2 47.4016.27543,868789  86% 64% 64% 78%
6.8C++ g++ #3 26.2416.57182,520844  1% 0% 64% 94%
7.8OCaml #2 19.0419.06511,656615  43% 0% 0% 57%
8.3Lisp SBCL #3 42.5120.18920,2761948  85% 43% 43% 41%
8.7Java  #7 21.4921.19562,9481284  93% 1% 8% 1%
8.8F# Mono 68.1621.43902,276639  75% 79% 82% 83%
8.8Ruby JRuby #2 58.2821.452,151,328417  65% 63% 63% 82%
8.9Ruby JRuby #3 58.6921.732,059,328501  72% 66% 60% 73%
9.0F# Mono #3 65.5421.992,240,792870  71% 83% 71% 75%
9.7Python 3 #5 23.5623.58326,816424  1% 0% 100% 0%
9.7Java  #4 25.0423.61727,292921  11% 3% 4% 90%
10Ruby #6 25.3225.33165,064442  0% 100% 0% 0%
11Go #8 85.5325.85541,836785  96% 78% 77% 81%
11PHP #3 26.3226.34208,852459  80% 0% 0% 21%
11Hack #3 27.3827.41288,600456  1% 100% 0% 1%
11Hack #2 27.5427.56281,292446  1% 100% 0% 1%
12Ruby #5 29.3429.35154,896343  0% 100% 0% 0%
12C# Mono #6 76.2229.57273,828638  56% 80% 55% 68%
12C gcc #2 30.0630.07124,8801099  1% 0% 100% 1%
14Ruby #2 33.8433.86389,432417  37% 15% 29% 21%
14PHP #2 34.1934.22216,440449  92% 0% 8% 0%
15Scala 39.6335.87742,396611  13% 21% 15% 63%
16Ruby JRuby #5 45.2639.491,004,576343  11% 59% 5% 41%
16Racket 40.0740.07720,060527  0% 1% 100% 0%
17Ruby JRuby #6 46.4640.881,002,964442  22% 25% 43% 25%
18Go 131.2342.83545,852733  77% 69% 69% 92%
20Erlang HiPE #6 182.8147.68337,0961058  92% 96% 99% 97%
20Ruby 48.3748.39346,140308  0% 100% 0% 0%
24Erlang #6 179.8857.58301,5441058  99% 76% 65% 72%
26Perl #4 62.2662.29189,296440  0% 0% 0% 100%
27C# Mono #2 66.2166.23274,196594  19% 1% 14% 68%
28C# Mono 67.7167.74718,272624  0% 1% 96% 4%
28F# Mono #2 67.9667.99899,592413  99% 1% 1% 1%
33Ruby JRuby 90.4280.392,222,052308  38% 5% 60% 11%
35Go #7 85.8384.90462,776652  5% 1% 43% 54%
Clojure #3 Failed710
Clojure #4 Failed707
Dart #2 Timed Out5 min648
Erlang Timed Out10 min622
Erlang HiPE Timed Out10 min622
Java  #6 Failed1410
Lisp SBCL Timed Out10 min591
Racket #2 Bad Output536
Scala #4 Failed723
Scala #3 Failed633
"wrong" (different) algorithm / less comparable programs
1.2Perl #7 4.332.92140,044567
1.2Java  #3 8.283.01246,6042084
1.2Erlang HiPE #7 7.803.05387,6161198
1.5Erlang #7 8.613.59387,6321198
1.8Perl #6 4.454.46190,244477
8.6Pascal Free Pascal 20.9720.99114,8521199
missing benchmark programs
Fortran Intel No program
Pascal Free Pascal No program

 regex-dna benchmark : Match DNA 8-mers and substitute nucleotides for IUB codes

diff program output for this 100KB input file (generated with the fasta program N = 10000) with this output file to check your program is correct before contributing.

We are trying to show the performance of various programming language implementations - so we ask that contributed programs not only give the correct result, but also use the same algorithm to calculate that result.

We use FASTA files generated by the fasta benchmark as input for this benchmark. Note: the file may include both lowercase and uppercase codes.

Each program should

Revised BSD license

  Home   Conclusions   License   Play