/mobile Handheld Friendly website

 mandelbrot benchmark N=16,000

Each chart bar shows how many times slower, one ↓ mandelbrot program was, compared to the fastest program.

These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programming languages.

Column × shows how many times more each program used compared to the benchmark program that used least.

     sortsortsort
  ×   Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
1.0C gcc #9 19.445.0231,928694  96% 96% 100% 96%
1.2Ada 2005 GNAT #3 22.755.7930,2841805  97% 98% 100% 99%
1.2C++ g++ #7 23.775.9732,3881017  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.2C gcc #3 24.086.0531,644763  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.2C gcc #4 24.176.0729,104799  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.2C gcc #7 24.246.0931,932994  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.3C gcc #6 24.656.1829,064879  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.3C gcc 24.666.1829,568822  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.4Java  #2 27.847.1162,344796  98% 97% 98% 100%
1.4Java  #6 28.087.1762,432802  98% 97% 98% 99%
1.5Lisp SBCL 28.407.7136,2082459  100% 84% 88% 97%
1.5Scala #4 28.567.42285,580786  96% 96% 98% 96%
1.5C++ g++ #6 28.667.1931,9361035  100% 100% 100% 100%
1.7Clojure #7 32.128.94144,4241195  88% 96% 86% 91%
1.7C# Mono #4 32.228.1850,892872  98% 99% 98% 99%
1.7C# Mono #6 32.248.1950,972986  98% 99% 99% 98%
1.7C++ g++ #9 33.088.6032,384726  95% 95% 95% 100%
1.7C++ g++ #8 33.3912.3232,388742  36% 36% 100% 100%
1.9F# Mono #4 36.819.4456,552869  97% 97% 98% 98%
1.9C++ g++ #5 37.6837.7032,256590  1% 0% 0% 100%
2.0C++ g++ #2 39.5539.5632,328687  99% 1% 1% 1%
2.2Java  42.9842.9519,576665  1% 1% 0% 99%
2.3C# Mono #3 45.2411.4450,068701  99% 99% 99% 99%
2.3F# Mono #3 45.4511.5351,560800  98% 100% 98% 98%
2.4Haskell GHC #2 45.8111.4937,116782  100% 100% 100% 100%
2.4C# Mono 46.0311.6449,840798  99% 99% 100% 99%
2.4Go #6 46.3511.6030,056700  100% 100% 100% 100%
2.4Lisp SBCL #3 46.6818.1936,480888  33% 92% 93% 40%
2.4C gcc #2 47.2347.25396400  0% 1% 0% 100%
2.5F# Mono #2 47.8412.9320,3121043  90% 99% 86% 94%
2.5Scala 48.1912.2254,428724  98% 98% 99% 100%
2.5Fortran Intel #4 48.4318.4157,492611  96% 34% 95% 41%
2.6Java  #3 50.8812.8862,416903  99% 99% 100% 98%
2.7Scala #2 51.8951.8023,796454  1% 1% 4% 97%
2.7Rust 52.2252.23780633  1% 100% 0% 0%
2.7Clojure #5 52.4150.68119,4441069  4% 83% 7% 21%
2.8Clojure #6 54.5415.28125,4001069  91% 89% 88% 89%
2.8C# Mono #2 55.0655.0715,596484  0% 1% 1% 100%
2.9OCaml 55.8814.046,548710  100% 100% 100% 100%
2.9OCaml #6 56.3456.363,128444  93% 0% 0% 7%
2.9Fortran Intel #5 56.7856.8032,732508  0% 0% 100% 0%
2.9Dart 56.9420.92183,204901  98% 38% 99% 38%
2.9Ada 2005 GNAT #2 57.2057.221,244572  0% 1% 100% 0%
3.4Pascal Free Pascal #4 66.6116.6729,544748  100% 100% 100% 100%
3.7Racket #4 71.6118.1160,436796  99% 99% 100% 99%
3.8Racket #3 73.8573.8121,040797  5% 1% 95% 0%
3.8C++ g++ #3 74.5774.601,072414  1% 0% 0% 100%
3.9Pascal Free Pascal #3 75.4175.428530  96% 0% 0% 4%
4.1Pascal Free Pascal 80.4330.1931,976820  95% 95% 41% 36%
4.5Racket #2 88.0488.0320,252585  0% 1% 100% 0%
5.3Racket 102.45102.5917,788517  1% 83% 18% 1%
6.9Pascal Free Pascal #5 134.9433.8429,872829  100% 100% 100% 100%
14Erlang HiPE 274.0377.841,269,512534  88% 96% 85% 84%
15Hack #2 283.58283.69107,372458  1% 0% 100% 1%
57Ruby JRuby #3 18 min18 min629,772307  24% 31% 29% 19%
66PHP #3 21 min5 min115,808863  100% 100% 100% 100%
67PHP 21 min21 min4,256443  28% 17% 33% 24%
91Python 3 #2 29 min7 min10,556777  90% 100% 90% 90%
96Ruby #3 31 min31 min7,508307  30% 29% 18% 25%
100Erlang 32 min8 min1,252,976534  98% 98% 98% 98%
102Python 3 #5 33 min8 min40,728449  100% 100% 100% 100%
110Ruby #2 35 min8 min182,724925  100% 100% 100% 100%
170Perl 55 min13 min41,196579  100% 100% 100% 100%
221Hack 1h 11 min1h 11 min86,296441  0% 100% 0% 0%
386Ruby JRuby #2 2h 05 min31 min712,676925  99% 99% 99% 99%
Fortran Intel #2 Bad Output813
Fortran Intel #3 Bad Output754
Fortran Intel Bad Output485
Hack #3 Failed864
Pascal Free Pascal #2 Make Error817
Python 3 #3 Failed304
Scala #3 Failed796
"wrong" (different) algorithm / less comparable programs
0.4C gcc #5 7.321.8516,0801026
0.6C++ g++ 10.742.7027,2881239
0.8C gcc #8 16.014.0231,924859
6.2Python 3 #6 120.6630.9952,1241380

 mandelbrot benchmark : Generate Mandelbrot set portable bitmap file

cmp program output N = 200 with this 5KB output file to check your program is correct before contributing.

We are trying to show the performance of various programming language implementations - so we ask that contributed programs not only give the correct result, but also use the same algorithm to calculate that result.

Mandlebrot output N=200,converted to PNG

Each program should plot the Mandelbrot set [-1.5-i,0.5+i] on an N-by-N bitmap. Write output byte-by-byte in portable bitmap format.

For more information see Eric W. Weisstein, "Mandelbrot Set." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MandelbrotSet.html

Thanks to Greg Buchholz for this benchmark.

Revised BSD license

  Home   Conclusions   License   Play