mandelbrot benchmark N=16,000

Each chart bar shows how many times more Memory, one ↓ mandelbrot program used, compared to the program that used least Memory.

These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programming languages.

Column × shows how many times more each program used compared to the benchmark program that used least.

    sortsort sort
  ×   Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
1.0Pascal Free Pascal #3 78.7278.758530  1% 100% 0% 0%
40C gcc #2 50.0150.02316400  0% 1% 1% 100%
109C++ g++ #3 177.98178.03872414  1% 14% 53% 34%
118Ada 2005 GNAT #2 58.1458.15944572  1% 0% 100% 0%
206OCaml #6 85.8085.841,648444  0% 95% 5% 0%
391PHP 19 min19 min3,124443  29% 18% 2% 53%
467OCaml 150.0337.713,736710  100% 100% 100% 99%
936Python 3 #2 30 min8 min7,488777  100% 94% 93% 94%
1,881Racket 106.66106.6415,044517  0% 1% 100% 0%
2,005Racket #2 95.7895.7616,036585  1% 0% 0% 100%
2,205Racket #3 76.6876.6617,636797  0% 1% 100% 0%
2,390C# Mono #2 57.2857.3019,120484  100% 1% 0% 1%
2,438Java  43.4043.3619,500665  1% 99% 1% 0%
2,783Scala #2 52.5052.4122,264454  100% 0% 0% 1%
2,806F# Mono #2 53.4814.4222,4441043  98% 92% 94% 88%
3,430C gcc #6 23.505.8927,440879  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,462C gcc 23.445.8827,692822  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,508Python 3 #5 39 min9 min28,064449  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,558C gcc #4 22.615.6728,464799  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,820Pascal Free Pascal #5 135.8434.0430,560829  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,873Pascal Free Pascal #4 289.8772.5930,980748  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,946C gcc #3 22.775.7231,568763  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,982C gcc #7 22.845.7431,852994  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,982C++ g++ #6 27.947.0231,8521035  100% 100% 100% 100%
3,982C gcc #9 29.947.7731,852694  95% 100% 95% 95%
3,994Pascal Free Pascal #2 83.6231.4931,948817  95% 36% 41% 95%
3,994Pascal Free Pascal 83.6031.5131,948820  36% 100% 36% 95%
4,008C++ g++ #5 35.0635.0732,060590  1% 1% 0% 100%
4,014C++ g++ #8 31.6411.6732,112742  100% 36% 37% 100%
4,016C++ g++ #2 40.1440.1532,128687  0% 100% 1% 0%
4,023C++ g++ #9 31.168.0832,180726  96% 100% 96% 96%
4,023C++ g++ #7 23.465.8932,1801017  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,033Go #6 48.3012.1032,264700  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,052Go 75.9419.0332,412823  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,060Ada 2005 GNAT #3 24.806.2432,4801805  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,076Fortran Intel #5 56.8956.9132,608508  0% 0% 100% 0%
4,082Go #3 26.296.6132,656894  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,159Haskell GHC #2 48.0612.0433,272782  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,329Go #2 43.4010.9034,628837  100% 100% 100% 100%
4,708Perl 1h 01 min15 min37,660579  100% 100% 100% 100%
5,485Rust 20.535.2343,8761290  97% 98% 98% 100%
5,648Lisp SBCL #3 75.5028.9645,184888  38% 95% 33% 95%
6,375C# Mono 45.8611.6450,996798  99% 99% 98% 98%
6,389Racket #4 78.2419.7651,112796  99% 99% 100% 99%
6,410C# Mono #3 44.6811.3551,280701  98% 99% 99% 98%
6,463C# Mono #6 30.627.8451,700986  99% 98% 97% 97%
6,463C# Mono #4 31.508.0651,704872  97% 99% 98% 97%
6,497F# Mono #3 45.0011.4551,972800  98% 98% 100% 98%
6,801Lisp SBCL 66.8718.7754,4042459  99% 82% 77% 100%
6,832Scala 50.9212.9154,652724  98% 99% 100% 98%
7,080F# Mono #4 35.259.1756,640869  95% 96% 98% 96%
7,549Fortran Intel #4 48.7318.4160,388611  96% 34% 96% 40%
8,501Dart 55.4720.4568,008901  98% 38% 98% 38%
9,466PHP #3 19 min290.9875,728863  100% 100% 100% 100%
10,085Ruby #2 1h 24 min21 min80,676925  100% 99% 99% 99%
10,207Java  #6 30.597.8081,652802  98% 99% 98% 98%
10,243Java  #2 27.036.9181,940796  98% 99% 97% 98%
10,479Java  #3 42.7610.8583,828903  99% 99% 99% 98%
10,600Scala #5 43.7415.9484,800589  91% 68% 65% 52%
10,700Scala #4 27.497.0885,596786  96% 99% 97% 97%
11,688Clojure #6 58.8015.9493,5041069  90% 96% 91% 93%
11,719Clojure #5 56.3254.5793,7481069  61% 21% 13% 10%
16,711Clojure #7 34.909.66133,6881195  88% 96% 89% 90%
28,174Ruby #6 1h 38 min25 min225,388909  97% 97% 97% 97%
78,277Ruby JRuby #3 15 min15 min626,212307  21% 30% 31% 22%
86,417Ruby JRuby #2 2h 16 min34 min691,336925  99% 99% 99% 99%
110,480Erlang HiPE 10 min169.77883,836534  95% 97% 94% 95%
283,124Ruby JRuby #4 44 min11 min2,264,992866  98% 98% 98% 98%
Fortran Intel Bad Output485
Fortran Intel #3 Bad Output754
Fortran Intel #2 Bad Output813
Python 3 #3 Failed304
Ruby #3 Timed Out1h 00 min307
Ruby #4 Timed Out1h 00 min866
Ruby #5 Bad Output1019
Ruby JRuby #6 Failed909
Ruby JRuby #5 Bad Output1019
Scala #3 Failed796
"wrong" (different) algorithm / less comparable programs
2,001C gcc #5 7.531.9016,0081026
3,307C++ g++ 10.722.6926,4561239
3,856C gcc #8 17.644.4230,848859
5,770Python 3 #6 157.5440.9446,1601380

 mandelbrot benchmark : Generate Mandelbrot set portable bitmap file

You can write your own program for this task and contribute to the benchmarks game by following these general instructions.

More specifically:

cmp program output N = 200 with this 5KB output file to check your program is correct before contributing.

We are trying to show the performance of various programming language implementations - so we ask that contributed programs not only give the correct result, but also use the same algorithm to calculate that result.

Mandlebrot output N=200,converted to PNG

Each program should plot the Mandelbrot set [-1.5-i,0.5+i] on an N-by-N bitmap. Write output byte-by-byte in portable bitmap format.

For more information see Eric W. Weisstein, "Mandelbrot Set." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MandelbrotSet.html

Thanks to Greg Buchholz for this benchmark.

Revised BSD license

  Home   Conclusions   License   Play