mandelbrot benchmark N=16,000

Each chart bar shows how many times slower, one ↓ mandelbrot program was, compared to the fastest program.

These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programming languages.

Column × shows how many times more each program used compared to the benchmark program that used least.

     sortsortsort
  ×   Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
1.0Rust 20.5120.5237,4681290  1% 1% 0% 100%
1.1C gcc #4 22.5922.6030,848799  1% 0% 1% 100%
1.1C gcc #3 22.7622.7631,568763  1% 1% 1% 100%
1.1C gcc #7 22.8222.8331,588994  0% 0% 1% 100%
1.1C gcc 23.4123.4228,988822  0% 0% 1% 100%
1.1C++ g++ #7 23.4423.4532,1801017  0% 1% 1% 100%
1.1C gcc #6 23.4623.4728,988879  1% 1% 0% 100%
1.2Ada 2005 GNAT #3 24.7924.8132,0041805  1% 0% 1% 100%
1.3Go #3 26.2826.2935,996894  0% 1% 1% 100%
1.3Java  #2 26.9626.9859,240796  1% 0% 0% 100%
1.3Scala #4 27.0427.0695,876786  1% 1% 0% 100%
1.4C++ g++ #6 27.9327.9431,5881035  0% 2% 1% 100%
1.4Java  #6 29.3329.3482,008802  1% 1% 0% 100%
1.5C gcc #9 29.9429.9530,852694  0% 1% 1% 100%
1.5C# Mono #6 30.5530.5651,544986  1% 0% 1% 100%
1.5C++ g++ #9 30.8630.8632,180726  0% 1% 1% 100%
1.5C++ g++ #8 31.2831.2832,180742  0% 0% 1% 100%
1.5C# Mono #4 31.5131.5251,544872  0% 1% 1% 100%
1.7Clojure #7 34.9634.99128,2641195  0% 1% 1% 100%
1.7C++ g++ #5 35.0635.0732,060590  1% 1% 1% 100%
1.7F# Mono #4 35.1535.1656,664869  1% 0% 0% 100%
2.0C++ g++ #2 40.1240.1432,128687  1% 1% 1% 100%
2.0Java  #3 41.2341.2554,420903  0% 1% 0% 100%
2.1Scala #5 43.3043.3185,292589  1% 1% 0% 100%
2.2Java  44.2444.2621,628665  1% 1% 1% 100%
2.2Go #2 44.4744.4932,156837  1% 1% 0% 100%
2.2C# Mono #3 44.6544.6651,288701  0% 0% 1% 100%
2.2F# Mono #3 45.0345.0551,972800  1% 1% 1% 100%
2.2C# Mono 45.8045.8151,004798  0% 1% 1% 100%
2.3Fortran Intel #4 47.3447.3557,868611  0% 0% 0% 100%
2.3Haskell GHC #2 47.7947.8134,980782  0% 1% 0% 100%
2.4Go #6 48.3248.3432,288700  1% 1% 0% 100%
2.4Scala 48.7448.7656,644724  1% 2% 0% 100%
2.4C gcc #2 50.0150.02316400  0% 0% 1% 100%
2.6Dart 52.7252.7462,936901  0% 0% 1% 100%
2.7Scala #2 56.0656.0824,288454  0% 1% 1% 100%
2.7Clojure #5 56.1256.1593,0161069  0% 1% 0% 100%
2.8Fortran Intel #5 56.4556.4632,604508  0% 0% 0% 100%
2.8C# Mono #2 57.4357.4519,124484  0% 0% 1% 100%
2.8Clojure #6 57.9257.9492,5641069  1% 1% 1% 100%
2.8Ada 2005 GNAT #2 58.1358.15944572  1% 0% 0% 100%
3.7Lisp SBCL #3 75.4975.5144,796888  1% 1% 1% 100%
3.7Go 75.9776.0032,140823  1% 1% 0% 100%
3.7Racket #3 76.7676.7917,632797  0% 0% 1% 100%
3.8Racket #4 78.2378.2651,108796  1% 0% 0% 100%
3.8Pascal Free Pascal #3 78.7278.758530  1% 1% 0% 100%
4.1Pascal Free Pascal #2 83.6083.6232,948817  0% 0% 1% 100%
4.1Pascal Free Pascal 83.6083.6332,128820  1% 1% 0% 100%
4.2OCaml #6 85.9385.961,648444  0% 0% 0% 100%
4.5Lisp SBCL 93.2693.2851,8482459  1% 0% 1% 100%
4.7Racket #2 95.4395.4616,020585  0% 0% 1% 100%
5.9Racket 120.25120.3415,024517  1% 0% 0% 100%
6.6Pascal Free Pascal #5 135.84135.8831,288829  1% 1% 1% 100%
7.3OCaml 150.52150.713,732710  0% 0% 0% 100%
9.2F# Mono #2 189.01189.0622,4281043  1% 1% 1% 100%
11C++ g++ #3 224.82224.88872414  0% 1% 1% 100%
14Pascal Free Pascal #4 289.90289.9831,720748  1% 1% 0% 100%
18Erlang HiPE 6 min6 min634,912534  0% 0% 0% 100%
37Smalltalk VisualWorks #2 12 min12 min22,216467  0% 0% 0% 100%
38Lua 13 min13 min1,044353  0% 0% 0% 100%
40Lua #6 13 min13 min24,428623  0% 0% 0% 100%
40Lua #2 13 min13 min820367  0% 0% 0% 100%
47Ruby JRuby #3 16 min16 min634,516307  0% 1% 1% 100%
48Ruby JRuby #5 16 min16 min1,369,6761019  1% 1% 1% 100%
53Ruby JRuby #4 18 min18 min2,276,172866  0% 1% 1% 100%
57PHP 19 min19 min3,120443  1% 0% 0% 100%
59PHP #3 20 min20 min108,408863  0% 0% 0% 100%
76Ruby JRuby #2 26 min26 min690,920925  0% 1% 1% 100%
85Python 3 #2 28 min28 min52,196777  1% 1% 1% 100%
113Python 3 #5 38 min38 min27,984449  1% 1% 1% 100%
272C CINT #2 1h 32 min1h 32 min4,860400  0% 0% 0% 100%
Fortran Intel Bad Output485
Fortran Intel #3 Bad Output754
Fortran Intel #2 Bad Output813
JavaScript V8 #2 Bad Output353
Perl Failed579
Python 3 #3 Failed304
Ruby #3 Timed Out1h 00 min307
Ruby #6 Timed Out1h 00 min909
Ruby #4 Timed Out1h 00 min866
Ruby #2 Timed Out1h 00 min925
Ruby #5 Timed Out1h 00 min1019
Ruby JRuby #6 Failed909
Scala #3 Failed796
"wrong" (different) algorithm / less comparable programs
0.4C gcc #5 7.517.5216,0081026
0.5C++ g++ 10.4510.4630,6281239
0.8C gcc #8 16.7116.7130,852859
7.7Python 3 #6 157.08157.4746,1521380

 mandelbrot benchmark : Generate Mandelbrot set portable bitmap file

You can write your own program for this task and contribute to the benchmarks game by following these general instructions.

More specifically:

cmp program output N = 200 with this 5KB output file to check your program is correct before contributing.

We are trying to show the performance of various programming language implementations - so we ask that contributed programs not only give the correct result, but also use the same algorithm to calculate that result.

Mandlebrot output N=200,converted to PNG

Each program should plot the Mandelbrot set [-1.5-i,0.5+i] on an N-by-N bitmap. Write output byte-by-byte in portable bitmap format.

For more information see Eric W. Weisstein, "Mandelbrot Set." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MandelbrotSet.html

Thanks to Greg Buchholz for this benchmark.

Revised BSD license

  Home   Conclusions   License   Play