Erlang HiPE vs Java 7 | Computer Language Benchmarks Game

1 : Are the Erlang HiPE programs faster? At a glance.

Each chart bar shows, for one unidentified benchmark, how much the fastest Erlang HiPE program used compared to the fastest Java 7 program.

These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only tasks that could be solved. These are just 10 tiny examples.

2 : Are the Erlang HiPE programs faster? Approximately.

Each table row shows, for one named benchmark, how much the fastest Erlang HiPE program used compared to the fastest Java 7 program.

Erlang HiPE used what fraction? used how many times more?
Benchmark	Time	Memory	Code
spectral-norm	3×	±	±
binary-trees	3×	±	±
pidigits	3×	¹/₃	¹/₄
regex-dna	5×	¹/₄	±
k-nucleotide	5×	2×	¹/₂
fannkuch-redux	5×	¹/₂	±
n-body	7×	¹/₂	±
fasta	10×	¹/₂	±
reverse-complement	11×	±	2×
mandelbrot	14×	9×	±

Erlang HiPE used what fraction? used how many times more?
Time-used	\|-	\|---	25%	median	75%	---\|	-\|
(Elapsed secs)	3×	3×	3×	5×	10×	14×	14×

± read the measurements and then read the program source code.

3 : Are the Erlang HiPE programs faster? Measurements.

These are not the only tasks that could be solved. These are just 10 tiny examples. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programs that could be written.

For each named benchmark, measurements of the fastest Erlang HiPE program are shown for comparison against measurements of the fastest Java 7 program.

Program Source Code	CPU secs	Elapsed secs	Memory KB	Code B	≈ CPU Load
spectral-norm
Erlang HiPE	45.12	45.13	10,164	747	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	16.13	16.14	14,924	950	1% 0% 0% 100%
binary-trees
Erlang HiPE	47.57	47.63	338,644	499	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	15.70	15.75	506,592	603	0% 1% 0% 100%
pidigits
Erlang HiPE	23.23	23.26	15,100	512	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	7.33	7.34	47,440	1826	0% 0% 0% 100%
regex-dna
Erlang HiPE	114.18	114.22	145,476	1058	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	22.63	22.66	557,080	1284	0% 0% 0% 100%
k-nucleotide
Erlang HiPE	267.32	267.52	1,045,072	932	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	50.69	50.73	494,040	1630	1% 0% 0% 100%
fannkuch-redux
Erlang HiPE	379.68	379.80	7,644	1038	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	71.26	71.28	13,936	1282	0% 0% 0% 100%
n-body
Erlang HiPE	167.57	167.61	7,632	1399	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	24.40	24.41	13,996	1424	0% 0% 0% 100%
fasta
Erlang HiPE	49.98	50.00	7,632	1164	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	4.92	4.92	14,932	1507	0% 1% 0% 100%
reverse-complement
Erlang HiPE	21.24	21.26	563,348	1302	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	1.88	1.92	511,484	745	2% 1% 3% 100%
mandelbrot
Erlang HiPE	370.80	370.98	634,912	534	0% 0% 0% 100%
Java 7	26.92	26.93	67,880	796	0% 0% 0% 100%
fasta-redux
	No program
Java 7	0.12	0.12	?	1443	0% 33% 0% 100%

4 : Are there other Erlang HiPE programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest Erlang HiPE and Java 7 programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are other implementations of these benchmark programs for Erlang HiPE.

Maybe one of those other Erlang HiPE programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

5 : Are there other faster programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest Erlang HiPE and Java 7 programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are faster implementations of these benchmark programs for other programming languages.