Ubuntu : Intel® Q6600® one core
Computer Language Benchmarks Game      [[ Play ]]

- all benchmarks - n-body fannkuch-redux meteor-contest fasta fasta-redux spectral-norm reverse-complement mandelbrot k-nucleotide regex-dna pidigits chameneos-redux thread-ring binary-trees-redux binary-trees - all languages - Ada 2005 GNAT ATS C CINT C gcc Clojure C# Mono C++ g++ Dart Erlang HiPE F# Mono Fortran Intel Go Haskell GHC Java 7 JavaScript V8 Lisp SBCL Lua OCaml Pascal Free Pascal Perl PHP Python 3 Racket Ruby 2.0 Ruby JRuby Scala Smalltalk VisualWorks

÷ Ada 2005 GNAT ATS C CINT C gcc Clojure C# Mono C++ g++ Dart Erlang HiPE F# Mono Fortran Intel Go Haskell GHC Java 7 JavaScript V8 Lisp SBCL Lua OCaml Pascal Free Pascal Perl PHP Python 3 Racket Ruby 2.0 Ruby JRuby Scala Smalltalk VisualWorks x86 one core x64 quad-core x86 quad-core x64 one core

 1 : Are the programs faster? At a glance.

Each chart bar shows, for one unidentified benchmark, how much the fastest program used compared to the fastest C++ g++ program.

These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programs that could be written. These are not the only tasks that could be solved. These are just 10 tiny examples.

 2 : Are the programs faster? Approximately.

Each table row shows, for one named benchmark, how much the fastest program used compared to the fastest C++ g++ program.

used what fraction? used how many times more?
Benchmark	Time	Memory	Code

used what fraction? used how many times more?
Time-used	|-	|---	25%	median	75%	---|	-|
(Elapsed secs)

± read the measurements and then read the program source code.

 3 : Are the programs faster? Measurements.

These are not the only tasks that could be solved. These are just 10 tiny examples. These are not the only compilers and interpreters. These are not the only programs that could be written.

For each named benchmark, measurements of the fastest program are shown for comparison against measurements of the fastest C++ g++ program.

Program Source Code	CPU secs	Elapsed secs	Memory KB	Code B	≈ CPU Load
binary-trees
	No program
C++ g++	0.04	0.04	?	892	0% 0% 0% 80%
regex-dna
	No program
C++ g++	0.05	0.06	?	648	0% 0% 0% 100%
n-body
	No program
C++ g++	0.11	0.11	?	1763	0% 0% 0% 100%
fannkuch-redux
	No program
C++ g++	0.17	0.17	?	1150	0% 0% 0% 100%
spectral-norm
	No program
C++ g++	0.07	0.07	?	1044	20% 0% 0% 100%
fasta
	No program
C++ g++	0.05	0.05	?	1105	0% 0% 0% 100%
fasta-redux
	No program
C++ g++	0.03	0.03	?	1474	0% 0% 0% 100%
pidigits
	No program
C++ g++	0.09	0.09	?	682	10% 0% 10% 100%
k-nucleotide
	No program
C++ g++	0.53	0.53	9,220	1252	2% 0% 2% 100%
reverse-complement
	No program
C++ g++	0.02	0.06	?	2275	0% 0% 0% 83%
mandelbrot
	No program
C++ g++	0.08	0.09	?	726	0% 0% 10% 100%

 4 : Are there other programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest and C++ g++ programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are other implementations of these benchmark programs for .

Ada 2005 GNAT ATS C CINT C gcc Clojure C# Mono C++ g++ Dart Erlang HiPE F# Mono Fortran Intel Go Haskell GHC Java 7 JavaScript V8 Lisp SBCL Lua OCaml Pascal Free Pascal Perl PHP Python 3 Racket Ruby 2.0 Ruby JRuby Scala Smalltalk VisualWorks

Maybe one of those other programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

 5 : Are there other faster programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest and C++ g++ programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are faster implementations of these benchmark programs for other programming languages.

n-body fannkuch-redux meteor-contest fasta fasta-redux spectral-norm reverse-complement mandelbrot k-nucleotide regex-dna pidigits chameneos-redux thread-ring binary-trees-redux binary-trees

Maybe one of those other programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

  :  

 

  Home   Conclusions   License   Play